THESE ARE MY THREE PEER NURSING ARTICLES THAT YOU WILL USED TO CRITIQUE ONLY THE LITERATURE REVIEWED SECTION OF EACH OF THE ARTICLES. PLEASE DO NOT USED ANY OTHER ARTICLES. PLEASE READ THE DESCRIPTION OF THIS PAPER AND FOLLOW THE RUBRIC TO WRITE THE LITERATURE REVIEW PAPER.
Davis, M., Young, L., Davis, S. P., & Moll, G. (2008). PARENTAL DEPRESSION, FAMILY FUNCTIONING AND OBESITY AMONG AFRICAN AMERICAN CHILDREN. Journal Of Cultural Diversity, 15(2), 61-65.
Payas, N., Budd, G. M., & Polansky, M. (2010). Exploring Relationships Among Maternal BMI, Family Factors, and Concern for Child’s Weight. Journal Of Child & Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 23(4), 223-230. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6171.2010.00248.x
Flink, I. E., Jansen, P. W., Beirens, T. J., Tiemeier, H., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Jaddoe, V. V., & … Raat, H. (2012). Differences in problem behaviour among ethnic minority and majority preschoolers in the Netherlands and the role of family functioning and parenting factors as mediators: the Generation R. Study. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1092
LITERATURE REVIEW Each learner must select a topic of interest and then select 3 PEER REVIEWED NURSING JOURNAL ARTICLES (SHOULD BE FROM YEAR 2008 to 2013) to critique the LITERATURE REVIEW. The learner is to critique each LITERATURE REVIEW SECTION OF THE RESEARCH PUBLICATION. It is recommended to review manuscripts related to practice proposal. Include a complete citation for each manuscript. SEE RUBIC TO REVIEW POINTS THAT FACULTY WILL USE TO GRADE THE ASSIGNMENT. PLEASE FOLLOW THIS RUBIC IN ORDER FOR ME TO HAVE A FULL GRADE
LITERATURE REVIEW GRADING RUBRIC: TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS -100
A maximum of 10 points in each section represent reflection, analysis, and synthesis of thorough understanding of a literature review. The learner will demonstrate college level writing skills and scholarly exploration of the topics. Writing will be logical, coherent, and demonstrate comprehension of literature review. Writing will be original and unique to the learner’s scholarly perspective.
Content Points Faculty comment
Written work follows APA format. Selected manuscripts are appropriately cited and accessible through Stratford library or copy of manuscriptпїЅs literature review section provided to faculty. Spelling and grammar and logic are followed. 0 – 12pts
Identifies purpose, question, or hypothesis of selected article 0 – 10 pts
Identifies search terms and techniques used to conduct the search 0 – 10 pts
Critiques evidence of support of hypothesis or question or purpose 0 – 8 pts
Discussion of identification of gaps or conflicts reviewed; Coverage of findings supportive of studyпїЅs purpose 0 – 10 pts
Discussion of review’s coverage of key variables 0 – 20 pts
Discussion of selection of manuscripts included in review: primary or secondary sources, resource level 0 – 10 pts
Evaluation of review for completeness or evidence of bias 0 – 10 pts
Rationale for selection (application to interest) Reflection about value toward personal proposal 0-10 pts